Elections Commissioner post challenged

[TamilNet, Thursday, 09 December 1999, 19:39 GMT]
The appointment of an acting Commissioner of Elections by the President has been challenged before the Supreme Court on grounds that it doesn't comply with the Provisions of the Presidential Elections Act, said Attorney at law Manohara De Silva.

Manohara De Silva, pleading in support of the application challenging the appointment of the Acting Commissioner of Election, continued that there was no merit in the argument that the constitution is the supreme law.

The Constitution provides for the President to appoint the Commissioner of Elections. Under the Presidential Elections Act, it is the Commissioner of Elections who is empowered to appoint an acting Elections Commissioner.

The following is an excerpt of the exchange between the court and de Silva's counsel:

Court : Does the constitution stipulate that the President cannot make the appointment.

Court :Counsel: No

Court: Does the Act stipulate that she cannot exercise her discretion?.

Counsel: The court has to view the context when there is a conflict between the constitution and the Act.

Court: How can we read into the constitution what is not there?

Counsel: When there is a conflict, it has to be resolved only by rules of Interpretation.

Court: Later law will supersede.

Counsel: Act is the later law, while the constitution is anterior. Therefore this rule is in favour of the application.

Court: Would you agree that if we hold with you there can be disastrous consequences?

Counsel: We have not filed the application to create disaster. Court has to consider the legal position, not the consequences.

Although the President has discretionary powers, it is not absolute discretion. "Today she has appointed a person not serving in the Elections department. Next time, it can be a total outsider. The discretion has to be exercised in the spirit of the constitution, the spirit of democracy and fair play," de Silva's counsel said.

He concluded that the petitioners only seek a declaration that the appointment was illegal in order to ensure that there is no abuse of discretionary powers in the future.

The inquiry proceeds today.

Ravaya Newspaper Deputy Editor Newton Seneviratne and Air Vice Marshal Harry Gunatileke are the petitioners.


Related Articles:
02.12.99   Court examines Dasanayake appointment

 

Latest 15 Reports
24.08.19 02:22  
Tamil representatives urged to boycott OMP office opening in Jaffna
24.08.19 00:04   Photo
Despite ending Emergency, Sirisena keeps SL military empowered with police powers
23.08.19 07:04  
SL Forest Department remains unmoved by uprooted Tamils’ demand for resettlement
22.08.19 06:50  
40 parents of missing persons die within 915 days of protest
21.08.19 18:17   Photo
‘Death certificates’ issued to 500 of 3,500 Tamils subjected to enforced disappearance in Ampaa'rai
20.08.19 20:23  
Wigneswaran warns of bleak future for Tamils, urges planning for next step
19.08.19 19:23   Photo
IC sheds crocodile tears over Shavendra appointment, US engages with his war-time chief
18.08.19 23:50   Photo
SL TID detains outspoken Tamil doctor at Pazhai hospital
17.08.19 23:08   Photo
SLA Jaffna commander refuses to release Palaali lands at meeting presided by Wickramasinghe
16.08.19 13:25   Photo
SL Archaeology Department resumes plans to construct controversial ‘chaitya’ at Koonith-theevu
15.08.19 21:39  
Wickramasinghe lacks courage to meet protesting Tamil mothers in North
14.08.19 23:31   Photo
2006 genocidal massacre at Chengchoalai campus marked in Vanni, Jaffna amidst PTA-threats
13.08.19 17:45   Photo
Tamil awareness urged on geopolitics-driven genocidal ‘development’ in Mannaar
12.08.19 20:04   Photo
Percival's 19th century Tamil proverb compilations collated and sorted in new publication
11.08.19 20:32   Photo
PTA-threats against constructing memorial arch for student victims of 2006 aerial massacre
 
Find this article at:
http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=4325