Election bill amendments need 2/3 majority - Supreme Court

[TamilNet, Wednesday, 18 June 2003, 10:50 GMT]
The Sri Lanka's parliament Speaker Mr.Joseph Michael Perera Wednesday informed the house that the Supreme Court has determined that two third majority is required to pass the Local Authorities (Special Provisions) Bill in parliament, parliamentary sources said.

The Supreme Court, which held its inquiry two weeks ago into the petitions challenging the legal validity of the draft bill, sent its determination Tuesday evening to the Speaker, sources said

Tamil political sources said the decision of the Supreme Court has made it necessary for United National Front (UNF) government to muster support of 150 parliamentarians to obtain two third majority in the parliament to pass the draft bill. The present parliamentary strength of the ruling UNF (including its allies) is around one hundred and twenty three, sources said

The Local Authoroties (Special Provisions) Bill empowered the Commissioner of Elections for calling fresh nominations and the holding of elections in respect of certain municipal councils, urban councils and Pradesya Sabahs in the northeast province where election to such councils and Sabahs have been postponed due to unforeseen and urgent circumstances; and to provide for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto, legal sources said.

The petitioners, Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) Lawyers Association Assistant Secretary Champani Padmasekara and Attorney-at-Law Mr.Sarath Jayasinghe challenged in the Supreme Court that the Local Authorities (Special Provisions) Bill is inconsistent with the Constitution. The Bill introduces a dangerous principle that elections can be cancelled. There was no reason for the postponements of pending elections or their cancellation as the security situation had improved with the ceasefire, counsel for the petitioners argued.

During the inquiry at one stage the Chief Justice who presided over the Bench said the government's decision to cancel the nominations and to call for fresh nomination would not be a welcome trend and it is very important to hold local government elections in the northeast.


Related Articles:
05.06.03   Political confusion in Colombo said undermining peace
03.06.03   Colombo urged to drop ‘double standard on interim mechanism’

 

Latest 15 Reports
23.03.21 12:41   Photo
No focus on Tamil genocide, geopolitics gets played out in Geneva in favour of QUAD formation
21.03.21 13:34   Photo
Navi Pillay explains ‘human rights’ limitations in Geneva on Tamil genocide
15.03.21 20:36   Photo
Deceived Tamil activists in UK falsely claimed ‘substantial changes’ to Zero draft
09.03.21 21:34   Photo
UK repeatedly wronged Tamils says hunger-striker, demands genocide justice
26.02.21 11:53   Photo
Tamils witness false dilemma in Geneva as geopolitical formations pit against each other
19.02.21 14:02   Photo
UK not prepared to push for ICC option in new UNHRC Resolution
07.02.21 23:16   Photo
Unprecedented P2P uprising paves the way for rights-oriented politics of Tamils and Muslims
22.01.21 08:01   Photo
Gotabaya sets up deceptive COI citing ‘sovereignty’ and ‘non-aligned’ foreign policy
18.01.21 23:44   Photo
Tamil activists resisted three sources of outside influence while drafting demands to UNHRC
16.01.21 11:03  
Tamil national parties demand UN to inquire into crime of genocide and set up IIIM
09.01.21 09:37   Photo
Demolition of Tamil genocide monument, fourth emblematic trauma since 1974: Rev Fr Sakthivel
08.01.21 23:51   Photo
Colombo destroys Mu'l'livaaykkaal memorial monument at Jaffna University
07.01.21 11:22   Photo
With emphasis on genocide, Suresh calls for ICC-referral, IIIM and referendum
07.01.21 00:04   Photo
Boyle prefers IIIM demand over ICC-referral, says specific reference to genocide essential
06.01.21 14:26  
Indian Minister of External Affairs Jaishankar trades off Tamils’ sovereign rights
 
Find this article at:
http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=9234