2ND LEAD (Adds link)

Boyle: Appointing alleged war-criminals to UN posts, a violation of UN Charter

[TamilNet, Wednesday, 08 February 2012, 05:30 GMT]
While Ban Ki Moon's spokesman Martin Nesirky insisted that Ban is powerless to stop the proposed appointment of alleged war-criminal Shavendra Silva to an UN adviser position, Professor Boyle, an expert in international law, said, "U.N. Secretary-General has a Charter obligation to determine that the terms of article 101(3) have been satisfied before he appoints someone to the Staff irrespective of any alleged recommendation by the General Assembly," and therefore, "Ban to appoint a presumptive war criminal to his Staff would be ultra vires his powers under the terms of article 101(3) and thus a violation of the Charter itself."

Professor Francis A. Boyle, University of Illinois College of Law
Professor Francis A. Boyle, University of Illinois
Text of the legal note Professor Boyle sent to TamilNet follows:
    The United Nations Charter establishes Six Independent Organs: The Security Council, the General Assembly, the Economic and Social Council, the Trusteeship Council , the Secretariat, and the International Court of Justice. The U.N. Charter was deliberately drafted so that no one Organ had the right to order around any other Organ. Chapter XV of the Charter sets forth the independent powers and responsibilities of The Secretariat. According to article 97 thereof, the Secretary-General is the chief administrative officer of the United Nations Organization.

    Article 101 of the Charter provides: "The staff shall be appointed by the Secretary-General under regulations established by the General Assembly."

    However, these General Assembly regulations cannot trump the terms of the Charter itself. In this regard, article 101(3) clearly states: "The paramount consideration in the employment of the staff and in the determination of the conditions of service shall be the necessity of securing the highest standards of efficiency, competence, and integrity."

    The U.N. Secretary-General has a Charter obligation to determine that the terms of article 101(3) have been satisfied before he appoints someone to the Staff irrespective of any alleged recommendation by the General Assembly. Certainly the U.N. Secretary-General has a Charter obligation to reject a presumptive war criminal for appointment to the Staff on the grounds of his prima facie absence of "integrity."

    Indeed, for the U.N. Secretary General to appoint a presumptive war criminal to his Staff would be ultra vires his powers under the terms of article 101(3) and thus a violation of the Charter itself.

    For these reasons, the U.N. Secretary General must reject both Silva and Kohona for any U.N. Staff Appointment.
Inner City Press reported that even many member states describe the appointments as a travesty or a "new low," and say they are pushing Sri Lanka to pull Silva back, even if only to replace him with Permanent Representative Palitha Kohona, who also played a role in the White Flag killing of prospective surrenderees, along with Ban's chief of staff Vijay Nambiar.

Professor Francis A. Boyle taught United Nations Law in the College of Harvard University during the 1976-1977 Academic Year, and later for several years at the University of Illinois College of Law in Champaign. See his Foundations of World Order(Duke University Press: 1999).


Chronology:


Related Articles:
28.01.12   Silva's proposed UN appointment elicits condemnation from Ri..


External Links:
ICP: At UN Screening on Sri Lanka Murders, Kohona Tells Press to Ask Nambiar, Silva Says It Was 53rd Div - Lies Agreed On
FR: Foundations of World Order: The Legalist Approach to International Relations, 1898-1922
ICP: Amid Move to Switch From Criminal Silva, Ban Dismisses Predecessor Criticism
ICP: Sri Lanka Got Saudi & Nepal to Stand Down, Silva to Now Cede to Kohona?

 

Latest 15 Reports
23.03.21 12:41   Photo
No focus on Tamil genocide, geopolitics gets played out in Geneva in favour of QUAD formation
21.03.21 13:34   Photo
Navi Pillay explains ‘human rights’ limitations in Geneva on Tamil genocide
15.03.21 20:36   Photo
Deceived Tamil activists in UK falsely claimed ‘substantial changes’ to Zero draft
09.03.21 21:34   Photo
UK repeatedly wronged Tamils says hunger-striker, demands genocide justice
26.02.21 11:53   Photo
Tamils witness false dilemma in Geneva as geopolitical formations pit against each other
19.02.21 14:02   Photo
UK not prepared to push for ICC option in new UNHRC Resolution
07.02.21 23:16   Photo
Unprecedented P2P uprising paves the way for rights-oriented politics of Tamils and Muslims
22.01.21 08:01   Photo
Gotabaya sets up deceptive COI citing ‘sovereignty’ and ‘non-aligned’ foreign policy
18.01.21 23:44   Photo
Tamil activists resisted three sources of outside influence while drafting demands to UNHRC
16.01.21 11:03  
Tamil national parties demand UN to inquire into crime of genocide and set up IIIM
09.01.21 09:37   Photo
Demolition of Tamil genocide monument, fourth emblematic trauma since 1974: Rev Fr Sakthivel
08.01.21 23:51   Photo
Colombo destroys Mu'l'livaaykkaal memorial monument at Jaffna University
07.01.21 11:22   Photo
With emphasis on genocide, Suresh calls for ICC-referral, IIIM and referendum
07.01.21 00:04   Photo
Boyle prefers IIIM demand over ICC-referral, says specific reference to genocide essential
06.01.21 14:26  
Indian Minister of External Affairs Jaishankar trades off Tamils’ sovereign rights
 
Find this article at:
http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=34859