Court examines Dasanayake appointment

[TamilNet, Thursday, 02 December 1999, 20:18 GMT]
The appointment of D.P.S. Dasanayake as acting Commissioner of Elections by the President Kumaratunge is valid in law as it is consistent with the provisions of the constitution, Deputy Solicitor K.Sripavan told Court of Appeal today.

Mr. Sripavan was addressing Court at its hearing of two petitions challenging the appointment of the Acting Elections Commissioner.

Mr. Sripavan submitted to Court that initially the Commissioner of Elections wrote that he was ill and that the doctors had advised him to convalesce for two months.

The Elections Commissioner in his communication further requested the President to appoint a suitable person for the conduct of the Presidential polls.

Mr. Sripavan added that the Deputy Commissioner of Elections S. Arunthavachelvam wrote to the President making a request that he be relieved of election duty.

It was in that context that the President appointed an acting Commissioner of Elections for the conduct of the Presidential Polls.

However, the appointment made by the President was according to provision 103(4) of the constitution, he pleaded.

Attorney-at-law Manohara de Silva appearing for the petitioner argued that under the constitution the President is empowered to appoint an Elections Commissioner while the power to appoint the acting Commissioner of Elections lay with the Commissioner of Elections.

The appointment of an officer unattached to Elections department led to speculation over whether partiality could be guaranteed, he concluded.

The petitions sought an order to quash the appointment of acting Commissioner of Elections.

Ravaya Deputy News Editor Newton Seneviratne and former Air Marshal Harry Gunatileke are the petitioners.

The Bench comprised Justice Upali Gunawardena and Justice Asoka de Silva.

Further hearing was put off for December 8.

 

Latest 15 Reports
17.05.21 19:23   Photo
Ananthi blames war criminal Silva for blocking collective memorial at Mu'l'livaaykkaal
23.03.21 12:41   Photo
No focus on Tamil genocide, geopolitics gets played out in Geneva in favour of QUAD formation
21.03.21 13:34   Photo
Navi Pillay explains ‘human rights’ limitations in Geneva on Tamil genocide
15.03.21 20:36   Photo
Deceived Tamil activists in UK falsely claimed ‘substantial changes’ to Zero draft
09.03.21 21:34   Photo
UK repeatedly wronged Tamils says hunger-striker, demands genocide justice
26.02.21 11:53   Photo
Tamils witness false dilemma in Geneva as geopolitical formations pit against each other
19.02.21 14:02   Photo
UK not prepared to push for ICC option in new UNHRC Resolution
07.02.21 23:16   Photo
Unprecedented P2P uprising paves the way for rights-oriented politics of Tamils and Muslims
22.01.21 08:01   Photo
Gotabaya sets up deceptive COI citing ‘sovereignty’ and ‘non-aligned’ foreign policy
18.01.21 23:44   Photo
Tamil activists resisted three sources of outside influence while drafting demands to UNHRC
16.01.21 11:03  
Tamil national parties demand UN to inquire into crime of genocide and set up IIIM
09.01.21 09:37   Photo
Demolition of Tamil genocide monument, fourth emblematic trauma since 1974: Rev Fr Sakthivel
08.01.21 23:51   Photo
Colombo destroys Mu'l'livaaykkaal memorial monument at Jaffna University
07.01.21 11:22   Photo
With emphasis on genocide, Suresh calls for ICC-referral, IIIM and referendum
07.01.21 00:04   Photo
Boyle prefers IIIM demand over ICC-referral, says specific reference to genocide essential
 
Find this article at:
http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=4283