UNP's Counsel argues PA decision is correct

[TamilNet, Saturday, 11 December 1999, 07:53 GMT]
President's Counsel K. N. Chokesy, appearing for the UNP Presidential candidate Ranil Wickremasinghe, told yesterday the Court of Appeal that the appointment of an Acting Commissioner of Elections by President Chandrika Kumaratunge was an the exercise of the powers vested on her by the Constitution. Therefore, he argued, it was in compliance with the Constitution that this appointment has been made.

The Presidential Elections Act conceives a situation in which a commissioner is faced with a problem of being unable to perform his duties on a particular day and at that moment, he could appoint an acting person for a limited purpose, said Chokesy.

The Constitution conceives of a different situation.

Chokesy argued that under the Constitution, the President was the sole authority who could appoint an acting Elections Commissioner. The Constitution does not make any distinction between the appointment of a Commissioner of Elections and that of an acting person. Therefore, such a distinction is immaterial, he submitted.

Chokesy submitted that when there is a conflict between the Constitution and the Act, it is the Constitution that supercedes because Constitution is supreme law of the country.

He added that like the petitioners his client UNP Presidential candidate Ranil Wickremasinghe too stands for a free and fair election but under no circumstances could they consent to a postponement of the Presidential Polls at this juncture.

Deputy Solicitor General K. Siripavan submitted to Court that the appointment made by the President is valid in law.

The Bench comprised Justice Yapa, Justice Asoka De Silva and Justice Upali Gunawardena.

Ravaya Newspaper Deputy Editor Newton Seneviratne and former Air Marshal Harry Gunatileke are the petitioners.

Further hearing was put off for Monday.


Related Articles:
09.12.99   Elections Commissioner post challenged
02.12.99   Court examines Dasanayake appointment

 

Latest 15 Reports
17.05.21 19:23   Photo
Ananthi blames war criminal Silva for blocking collective memorial at Mu'l'livaaykkaal
23.03.21 12:41   Photo
No focus on Tamil genocide, geopolitics gets played out in Geneva in favour of QUAD formation
21.03.21 13:34   Photo
Navi Pillay explains ‘human rights’ limitations in Geneva on Tamil genocide
15.03.21 20:36   Photo
Deceived Tamil activists in UK falsely claimed ‘substantial changes’ to Zero draft
09.03.21 21:34   Photo
UK repeatedly wronged Tamils says hunger-striker, demands genocide justice
26.02.21 11:53   Photo
Tamils witness false dilemma in Geneva as geopolitical formations pit against each other
19.02.21 14:02   Photo
UK not prepared to push for ICC option in new UNHRC Resolution
07.02.21 23:16   Photo
Unprecedented P2P uprising paves the way for rights-oriented politics of Tamils and Muslims
22.01.21 08:01   Photo
Gotabaya sets up deceptive COI citing ‘sovereignty’ and ‘non-aligned’ foreign policy
18.01.21 23:44   Photo
Tamil activists resisted three sources of outside influence while drafting demands to UNHRC
16.01.21 11:03  
Tamil national parties demand UN to inquire into crime of genocide and set up IIIM
09.01.21 09:37   Photo
Demolition of Tamil genocide monument, fourth emblematic trauma since 1974: Rev Fr Sakthivel
08.01.21 23:51   Photo
Colombo destroys Mu'l'livaaykkaal memorial monument at Jaffna University
07.01.21 11:22   Photo
With emphasis on genocide, Suresh calls for ICC-referral, IIIM and referendum
07.01.21 00:04   Photo
Boyle prefers IIIM demand over ICC-referral, says specific reference to genocide essential
 
Find this article at:
http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=4331