Sarath case Hearing continues

[TamilNet, Tuesday, 08 February 2000, 04:55 GMT]
President's Counsel Ranjith Abeysuriya told the Supreme Court yesterday that the exercise of power by the Chief Justice to constitute a Court to hear the case against him was unreasonable. Mr. Abeysuriya was supporting the application that challenges the appointment of Mr. Sarath Silva as Chief Justice.

Mr.Abeysuriya raised a preliminary objection that the Court was not constituted in compliance with the provisions of the constitution.

Court:- Are you objecting to our sitting here to hear this case?

Counsel:- No

Court:- So you are objecting to the order made by the Chief Justice?

Counsel:- In that case the Supreme Court sitting to hear a case under the Fundamental Rights jurisdiction cannot exercise writ jurisdiction.

Counsel:- Supreme Court can interpret the provisions of the constitution.

Court:- There is no interpretation involved in this. This matter should have been raised in a different forum, the Court of Appeal.

Mr.Abeysuriya continued, "if there is one principle which runs through the entire fabric of the constitution it is the principle of the Rule of Law, and under the Constitution it is the judiciary which is entrusted with the task of keeping every organ of the State within the limits of the law, thereby making the Rule of Law meaningful and effective.

"Judges should be of stern stuff and tough fibre, unbending before power, economic or political, and they must uphold the core principle of the Rule of Law which says "Be you ever so high, the Law is above you."

"This is the principle of independence of the Judiciary which is vital for the establishment of real participatory democracy, maintenance of the Rule of Law as a dynamic concept and the delivery of social justice to the vulnerable sections fo the community," Mr. Abeysuriya added.

The Bench comprised Justice Wadugodapitiya, Justice Kulatunga, Justice Prijantha Perera, Justice D.P.S.Gunasekera, Justice Shiranie Bandaranayaka, Justice Ameer Ismail and Justice Weerasekera.

Ravaya Editor Victor Ivan, Sunday Times Deputy Editor Rajpal Abeynaike and A.Jayasekera are the petitioners in the case.

Further hearing continues.


Related Articles:
01.12.99   Sarath case descends into farce

 

Latest 15 Reports
24.05.20 15:14  
US-India partnership reached unprecedented levels, says outgoing US top diplomat
23.05.20 18:34  
Gotabaya’s 19 May speech, outcome of defeatism, irresponsibility, say Colombo-based Tamils
22.05.20 23:11   Photo
Eight SL Navy personnel test positive in controversial quarantine centre in Vanni
21.05.20 15:56   Photo
TYO-UK pushes back on British Foreign Secretary's May 18 tweet
20.05.20 22:09  
SL TID interrogates outspoken Tamil activist VS Sivakaran in Mannaar
19.05.20 16:23   Photo
IBC's sister-media Gagana used to threaten Tamil villagers in Trinco on 18 May Remembrance
19.05.20 07:42   Photo
Eezham Tamil and Muslim solidarity non-negotiable in true spirit of Mu'l'livaaykkaal
18.05.20 23:20   Photo
Occupying SL military desecrates Remembrance Day candles, harasses Tamil politicians
18.05.20 07:11   Photo
Remembrance event urges Tamils to own justice project, establish genocidal intent of Sinhala state
17.05.20 05:18   Photo
Break paradigm that regards Tamils as victims to achieve equitable solution: Balakumaran in 2004
16.05.20 16:54   Photo
The Guardian succumbs to pressure from SL High Commission on indigenous term Eelam
15.05.20 12:26   Photo
SL Army fires at Tamil youth in Point Pedro, Jaffna
14.05.20 21:28   Photo
IC deceived Tamils on genocide investigation: Students of Faculty of Art at Jaffna University
13.05.20 22:55   Photo
Remembrance of Tamil Genocide and Resistance commences in occupied Tamil Eelam
12.05.20 23:03  
India neither ‘balancer’ or ‘challenger’ to China in Indo-Pacific: Aussie think-tank
 
Find this article at:
http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=4635