Jaffna Bishop rejects polls

[TamilNet, Saturday, 10 January 1998, 23:59 GMT]
The Catholic Bishop of Jaffna along with a group of senior clergymen declined to help the group monitoring local government elections in the peninsula today.

At a meeting held today with the seven election monitors from Colombo, Bishop Thomas Saundaranayagam of the Roman Catholic Church said that the Jaffna local government election was not in keeping with the wishes of the Tamil people.

He was with Rev. N. Nesakumar, Archdeacon of Jaffna and senior clergymen from other Christian denominations in Jaffna.

The Bishop said that the people of Jaffna had not asked for the elections and that the political parties taking part in the elections had been compelled to be to do so.

He reiterated that the atmosphere in Jaffna was not conducive for the elections. And he asked the election monitors how the clergy could show any interest in monitoring the polls in these circumstances.

Meanwhile, Wimal Fernando, a member of the election monitoring team complained at this meeting that the Eelam Peoples Democratic Party (EPDP) was saying one thing in Colombo and another in Jaffna.

He was responding to an EPDP statement appearing in Jaffna's Uthayan newspaper that the party had not signed an agreement with the other parties to eschew violence at the elections.

The election monitors later met the NGO Consortium of Jaffna and requested its assistance as well to monitor the polls.

A spokesperson for the Consortium said that the Jaffna people are living in an atmosphere that is not conducive for democratic elections. He said that their aspirations had not been fulfilled. Hence, according to him, the people of Jaffna are not in a position to decide for which party they should vote.

The seven member election monitoring Committee comprising two Sri Lankan NGO networks - the Peoples Action for Free and Fair Election (PAFFREL) and Movement for Free and Fair Election (MFFE)- flew to Jaffna on Friday, to work out the preliminaries for monitoring the elections on January 29.

Several members of the monitoring team, such as Sunandha Deshapriya and Arjuna Parakrama are seen among many Tamils as a soft peddling the PA's approach to the ethnic conflict.

 

Latest 15 Reports
24.04.22 05:44  
தீவின் நெருக்கடிச் சூழலில் ஈழத்தமிழர் தேசம் கடைப்பிடிக்கவேண்டிய நிலைப்பாடுகள்
09.04.22 14:44   Photo
குறிதவறும் ஈழத்தமிழர் தலைமைகளுக்கு வரலாறு தருகின்ற எச்சரிக்கை
21.01.22 07:24   Photo
ஈழத்தமிழர் தேசத்தின் தலைமைத்துவம் தேர்தல் அரசியற் கட்சிகளுக்கு அப்பாலானது
02.11.21 15:32   Photo
13 ஆம் சட்டத்திருத்தத்தால் கட்டமைக்கப்பட்ட இன அழிப்பை எதிர்கொள்ள முடியுமா?
15.09.21 08:19  
English version not available
17.05.21 19:23   Photo
Ananthi blames war criminal Silva for blocking collective memorial at Mu'l'livaaykkaal
09.04.21 14:46  
English version not available
23.03.21 12:41   Photo
No focus on Tamil genocide, geopolitics gets played out in Geneva in favour of QUAD formation
21.03.21 13:34   Photo
Navi Pillay explains ‘human rights’ limitations in Geneva on Tamil genocide
15.03.21 20:36   Photo
Deceived Tamil activists in UK falsely claimed ‘substantial changes’ to Zero draft
09.03.21 21:34   Photo
UK repeatedly wronged Tamils says hunger-striker, demands genocide justice
26.02.21 11:53   Photo
Tamils witness false dilemma in Geneva as geopolitical formations pit against each other
19.02.21 14:02   Photo
UK not prepared to push for ICC option in new UNHRC Resolution
07.02.21 23:16   Photo
Unprecedented P2P uprising paves the way for rights-oriented politics of Tamils and Muslims
22.01.21 08:01   Photo
Gotabaya sets up deceptive COI citing ‘sovereignty’ and ‘non-aligned’ foreign policy
 
Find this article at:
http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=672