SC concludes constitutional amendments inquiry

[TamilNet, Thursday, 03 October 2002, 18:05 GMT]
The inquiry into thirty-one petitions filed against the eighteenth and Nineteenth Constitutional amendments by the seven-member bench of the Supreme Court concluded Thursday. The Chief Justice Mr.Sarath N Silva, the chairman of the seven-member bench, said the order determining the constitutionality of the amendments would be forwarded to the President and the Speaker of parliament.

The petitions challenged the constitutionality of the amendments stating that they violate the sovereignty and franchise of the people. The petitioners sought the SC to determine that in addition to the passage of the amendments in parliament with two third majority, it should be approved at a referendum.

The other judges of the bench were Justices S.W.B.Wadugodapitiya, Ms Shiranee Bandaranaike, Ameer Ismail, Hector S.Yapa, P.Edussuriya and Asoka de Silva.

Counsel for the petitioner Peoples Alliance Mr.Jayamapthay Wickremaratne said that the nineteenth amendments removes the power of President to dissolve parliament after one year of its existence and vests it to parliament. "It constitutes a direct impact on the supremacy of the people. Therefore the amendment should be approved at a referendum," he argued.

At this stage the Chief Justice commented that the executive presidency and parliament are both elected by the people. "Therefore parliament represents a portion of supremacy. The parliament elected by the people persists for six years," the CJ stressed.

President Counsel Mr. Silva appearing on behalf of one of the petitioners said that the amendment envisaged the transfer of sovereignty. Therefore it needs an approval of the people at a referendum.

The Chief Justice then posed a question as to why a referendum is needed for the relevant amendment on its dissolution? President Counsel Mr. Silva further argued that the sovereignty of the people could not be transferred or lawfully vested with anybody else. The Chief Justice then posed another question whether is it justifiable for the President to dissolve parliament after one year of its existence when it was elected for a period of six years.


Latest 15 Reports
04.02.24 15:40   Photo
சியோனிசம் காணும் தோல்வி ஈழத்தமிழருக்குப் பலன் தரவல்ல படிமை மாற்றத்தின் அறிகுறி
24.04.22 05:44  
தீவின் நெருக்கடிச் சூழலில் ஈழத்தமிழர் தேசம் கடைப்பிடிக்கவேண்டிய நிலைப்பாடுகள்
09.04.22 14:44   Photo
குறிதவறும் ஈழத்தமிழர் தலைமைகளுக்கு வரலாறு தருகின்ற எச்சரிக்கை
21.01.22 07:24   Photo
ஈழத்தமிழர் தேசத்தின் தலைமைத்துவம் தேர்தல் அரசியற் கட்சிகளுக்கு அப்பாலானது
02.11.21 15:32   Photo
13 ஆம் சட்டத்திருத்தத்தால் கட்டமைக்கப்பட்ட இன அழிப்பை எதிர்கொள்ள முடியுமா?
15.09.21 08:19  
English version not available
17.05.21 19:23   Photo
Ananthi blames war criminal Silva for blocking collective memorial at Mu'l'livaaykkaal
09.04.21 14:46  
English version not available
23.03.21 12:41   Photo
No focus on Tamil genocide, geopolitics gets played out in Geneva in favour of QUAD formation
21.03.21 13:34   Photo
Navi Pillay explains ‘human rights’ limitations in Geneva on Tamil genocide
15.03.21 20:36   Photo
Deceived Tamil activists in UK falsely claimed ‘substantial changes’ to Zero draft
09.03.21 21:34   Photo
UK repeatedly wronged Tamils says hunger-striker, demands genocide justice
26.02.21 11:53   Photo
Tamils witness false dilemma in Geneva as geopolitical formations pit against each other
19.02.21 14:02   Photo
UK not prepared to push for ICC option in new UNHRC Resolution
07.02.21 23:16   Photo
Unprecedented P2P uprising paves the way for rights-oriented politics of Tamils and Muslims
Find this article at: